Karna didnt go with the kauravas to capture Drupada

 I have been reading the kmg version where its said that the kauravas went first to capture drupada as gurudakshina to drona.And then karna's name was added.Why will karna go with the kauravas as he is not a disciple of drona.Some manupulator has added karna here.And then as main kauravas including karna attacked drupada,he counterattacks and then all of them flee from the scene.Then there is no mention of karna.!It doesnt not mention karna shooting any arrows or any divyastras against drupada.And when after the kauravas were attacked by drupada,their names were mentioned,but karna is ingored.So its clear that karna didnt go with the kauravas,and his name is included to downgrade him,so that Arjuna does something that karna couldnt do.To say that karna lost to drupada is a blatant lie,and shows the conspiracy of some people to make him look inferior to Arjuna.karna defeated drupada in his digvijay later alone with his army.And karna defeated Jarasandha alone.The jarasandha from whom krishna ran away from mathura to dwaraka unable to face him in battle.The jarasandha whom krishna,bhima,arjuna had to go in disguise and ask for a wresting duel with bhima.Karna can easily defeat drupada.And kmg version also has a verse saying drona taught karna which is false.Drona's  gurukul is only for kshatriya prices.Its not even for ordianry kshatriyas.So why will drona teach karna who is not even a kshatriya at that time.And one verse says Karna became jealous of Arjuna in gurukul.This is again false.Seems some conspiritor wants to create an image of karna as someone who is jealous of Arjuna.

 Bhima defeating karna in for the Rajasuya yaga is false.Anga Kingdom is part of hastinapura,and Bhima wont fight with Karna.The sanskrit verses were translated wrongly.The verses say karnam means listen in sanskrit.And Another verse could have the term karanam which means because or by the act of.

The sanskrit verse in draupadi swayamvara that karna lifted the bow and drapuadi stopped him saying she doesnt want a suta as her lord is removed in kmg sanskrit version.The hindu rightwingers might have asked to remove them.And one verse is wrongly stated.

The sankrit verse meaning is

major kings like karna,shalya,who are famous,strong,and have knowledge in dhanurveda did not do
then how come it is possible for this brahmin who is not skilled in weapons.inclined to weakness,could string the bow?



yat karṇa śalya pramukhaiḥ pārthivair lokaviśrutaiḥ
      nānṛtaṃ balavadbhir hi dhanurvedā parāyaṇaiḥ

Now there is a word missing here.The sentence is incomplete.
It is 'the task'

It is not yat karna but yatkarin or yatkaryam which measn the task.

So it is
yat karin(yatkaryam) śalya pramukhaiḥ pārthivair lokaviśrutaiḥ
      nākritam balavadbhir hi dhanurvedā parāyaṇaiḥ


So the sentence means the task which major kings like  shalya,who are famous,strong,and have knowledge in dhanurveda was not done,then how is it possible for this brahmin who is not skilled in weapons.inclined to weakness, to string the bow?

tat kathaṃ tv akṛtāstreṇa prāṇato durbalīyasā
      baṭu mātreṇa śakyaṃ hi sajyaṃ kartuṃ dhanur dvijāḥ

It is not nanritam,It is nakritam.this means was not done.Sanskrit verse should be changed here.Karna's name is not there here.